By Yang Yu – Edited by Zainab Hashmi
Jury test Demanded, Plaintiff Match Group, LLC’s Original Complaint, Match Group, LLC v. Bumble Trading Inc., No. 6:18-cv-00080 (W.D. Tex, Mar. 16, 2018), hosted by Scribd.
An online dating company that owns Tinder, sued another dating app, Bumble Trading Inc., founded by three ex-Tinder executives, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Waco Division, alleging eight causes of action that included utility patent infringement, design patent infringement, and trademark infringement on March 16, 2018, Match Group.
Into the grievance, Match Group dedicated to the “swipe left” and “swipe right” top features of Tinder, that have been given a software application patent and design patent associated with the usage this dating app.
Match advertised, through the use of the same “swipe” feature and copying the “world-changing, card swipe-based, shared opt-in premise, ” Bumble infringed Tinder’s patents and trademark. Match/Tinder is granted a software application patent with U.S. Patent No. 9,733,811 for the “Matching Process System and Method” and a Registered Trademark No. 4,465,926 because of its “swipe” features. Into the issue, Match Group additionally stated that Bumble had copied Tinder’s graphical user interface, talk screen, as well as other features. Because of this, Match Group desired for injunction restraining Bumble from breaking its patent liberties as well as other liberties under Lanham Act and typical legislation competition that is unfair. Also, since Bumble was created by ex-Tinder’s co-founders, Match Group additionally reported which they took information that is“confidential to proposed Tinder features, ” an element that enables users to undo swipes, therefore desired for an injunction restraining Bumble from misappropriation of Match/Tinder’s trade secrets.
Bumble ended up being created by three ex-Tinder’s co-founders, Whitney Wolfe Herd, Chris Gulczynski and Sarah Mick. Bumble is somewhat not the same as Tinder in a single application that is particular: In Tinder, men and women can start conversations, whereas Bumble was created by having an aim to supply females the possibility to regulate the connection – an element that Tinder additionally later developed. In 2014, Herd filed case against Tinder and its own Chief Marketing Officer for intimate harassment and discrimination that is sexual. But, the 2 events settled the lawsuit without admission of every wrongdoing.
Before the filing regarding the intellectual home liberties lawsuit, there have been reports that Match had been enthusiastic about acquiring Bumble, which was in fact gaining much appeal among university students.
Since its development in 2014, Bumble directly competed with Tinder in the area of internet dating. A figure that was ten times larger than Tinder in 2017, according to Forbes, it had acquired more than 22 million registered users and achieved a 70% year-over-year growth. Recently in 2017, TechCrunch reported that Match made an offer to acquire Bumble for $450 million august. This offer ended up being declined by Bumble, presumably under an assumed valuation of $1 billion at that time. Based on Forbes, Match later approached Bumble with another greater valuation of “well over” $1 billion.
Relating to Recode and Axios, the lawsuit against Bumble may act as a chip uberhorny that is“bargaining by Match to pressurize Bumble to go back to your settlement associated with previously-declined purchase deal: the theory is if Bumble is obtained by Match Group, the lawsuit will fundamentally be fallen.
Yang Yu is just a 1l pupil at Harvard Law class.